<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leveraging Social Media Networks - SMX London</title>
	<atom:link href="http://endlessplain.com/2007/11/16/leveraging-social-media-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://endlessplain.com/2007/11/16/leveraging-social-media-networks/</link>
	<description>Digital Marketing Services</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: boris</title>
		<link>http://endlessplain.com/2007/11/16/leveraging-social-media-networks/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rbdrodeo.com/2007/11/16/leveraging-social-media-networks/#comment-299</guid>
		<description>From everything that I have been reading... The ROI is missing from SMO... and the quality of traffic is not good... It seems that SMO attracts the young and bored and not the buyers. Can anyone please prove me wrong! I want to believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From everything that I have been reading&#8230; The ROI is missing from SMO&#8230; and the quality of traffic is not good&#8230; It seems that SMO attracts the young and bored and not the buyers. Can anyone please prove me wrong! I want to believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
